<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yes but no but yes but no&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robertfletcher.net/archives/255/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robertfletcher.net/archives/255</link>
	<description>powered by the cuteness of kittens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 01:24:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://robertfletcher.net/archives/255/comment-page-1#comment-1705</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertfletcher.net/?p=255#comment-1705</guid>
		<description>6 Months of daylight saving is good but I think
the current set dates are out of proportion.

I reckon DLS should start 2 weeks earlier and finish 2 weeks earlier, to coincide with the equinoxes. 
I don&#039;t think that extending DLS into April was necessary, the mornings are far too dark around that time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6 Months of daylight saving is good but I think<br />
the current set dates are out of proportion.</p>
<p>I reckon DLS should start 2 weeks earlier and finish 2 weeks earlier, to coincide with the equinoxes.<br />
I don&#8217;t think that extending DLS into April was necessary, the mornings are far too dark around that time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fletcher</title>
		<link>http://robertfletcher.net/archives/255/comment-page-1#comment-1687</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fletcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertfletcher.net/?p=255#comment-1687</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that Polemic - I didn&#039;t realise that was the case back in 1933. 

It would certainly be a different place if secession had gone through. Imagine needing a passport to go to Melbourne!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that Polemic &#8211; I didn&#8217;t realise that was the case back in 1933. </p>
<p>It would certainly be a different place if secession had gone through. Imagine needing a passport to go to Melbourne!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polemic</title>
		<link>http://robertfletcher.net/archives/255/comment-page-1#comment-1686</link>
		<dc:creator>Polemic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertfletcher.net/?p=255#comment-1686</guid>
		<description>Small correction - the secession referendum in 1933 was successful, being supported by 68% of voters. Unfortunately it was held at the same time as a state election and the voters also chose to change governments. 

The incoming Labor Party was against seceding and as referendums were not binding in WA at the time (and only a handful specific referendums are binding today), instead of simply committing to the cause they ignored the will of the people and instead begrudgingly sent a delegation to Britain to argue the case.

After many months of deliberation, the British House of Commons committee that looked at the case finally decided that they could not consider the matter, nor make any judgement.

What a different place it would be today if the new government had supported the will of the people wholeheartedly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Small correction &#8211; the secession referendum in 1933 was successful, being supported by 68% of voters. Unfortunately it was held at the same time as a state election and the voters also chose to change governments. </p>
<p>The incoming Labor Party was against seceding and as referendums were not binding in WA at the time (and only a handful specific referendums are binding today), instead of simply committing to the cause they ignored the will of the people and instead begrudgingly sent a delegation to Britain to argue the case.</p>
<p>After many months of deliberation, the British House of Commons committee that looked at the case finally decided that they could not consider the matter, nor make any judgement.</p>
<p>What a different place it would be today if the new government had supported the will of the people wholeheartedly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://robertfletcher.net/archives/255/comment-page-1#comment-1668</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 06:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertfletcher.net/?p=255#comment-1668</guid>
		<description>yes i agree.  ahem.  more importantly, from where can i get these adorable clocks. i just want one or three and i have heaps of cash since the recession hit. ups to ya.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes i agree.  ahem.  more importantly, from where can i get these adorable clocks. i just want one or three and i have heaps of cash since the recession hit. ups to ya.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
